I will be logging out soon so I won’t be able to answer this till Monday eve. Someone will prob beat me to it, I hope. So as your mind will be at ease. Our government had nothing to do with 911. Please trust me. Will post facts tomorrow.
Just stopping by before I go to work. I know Popular Science did a conspiracy smashing piece about it if you want to look into it before I’m on here next.
Ever try keeping a secret between 5 people, Judy? It’s more difficult than you’d think. Things leak out eventually. Now, multiply that by 100 and you have an idea of how difficult it would be to keep a project such as killing two buildngs full of people, setting sharges on each and every floor that would be necessary to accomplish what physics did and all as a pretext for a war that could have been launched without any of that.
As JB said, Popular Science did a good job of debunking the theories regarding the murders. The Pentagon had many, many people on the ground that saw what happened even if the stop-action security film couldn’t capture the plane hitting the building. It sounded like a missile? How many people that said that have actually heard a missile? Very few, I’m sure. A lot of folks are disturbed by the way the Pentagon hole looked vs. the way a plane outline looks. Unfortunately for them, crashes like that don’t work like Warner Bros. cartoons and there wouldn’t be a plane outline as a hole.
The bottom line is that the givernment could have cooked up a much better, easier scenario for war if that’s what they wanted to do without killing civilians. My recommendation, in all seriousness, is to wait for the next full moon and listen to Mike Medved’s “Conspiracy Day”. I’m not joking. He has a program every month when the full moon rises that deals with a variety of conspiracies and people always call in with concerns such as yours. Whether you’re naïve is not for me to judge but I don’t share your concern as relates to the government and possible 9/11 ties. We were attacked by terrorists who hate us for a second time (by the way: why weren’t people concerned about conspiracies back then? Because Clinton didn’t retaliate with a war.). Whether that action was worth going to war in Afghanistan is for you to decide. I believe it was.
Please allow me to respond. People do not think you are naive. Moonbats think you are naive. President Bush is being blamed by the “blame America First” crowd, because the Clintons had 13 opportunities to take Bin Laden out during the clinton admin, three occasions where our CIA had Bin Laden in the crosshairs and were not allowed to take him out by the clintons. Shifting blame for catastrophe is the forte of the left wing. What Presidential papers do you think Sandy Burglar stuffed down his pants? Perhaps proof positive that the clintons were more concerned with sex and socialism to run the country. We call these “people” that consider the Bush Admin responsible for 911 “truthers”. Next time you are confronted by the “truthers” (if it is unavoidable) I would suggest you let them know you are on the them by calling them this. The entire movement, started by a slick hollywood dvd called “loose change” is totally absurd on it’s face. It is an agenda that is now driven by the likes of the Kos kids and the soros owned media. Just picture them all as rosie odonnell on her worst day.
I feel better. It does seem like there should have been at least one person with hard facts that support this conspiracy not just someone in their basement with a bunch of photos, news paper clippings and red string.
This is one reason among others that I can’t behind Ron Paul’s presidential bid. He sides with Michael Moore and Rosie O’Donnell as a 9/11 “truther”. <
Anyone can use a lot of loose innuendo to “prove” things but most of it when you look at them all together they don’t add up when you use continuous logic. Finally, when you have the time, Popular Mehcanics put out a book that explains almost everything they stand by regarding 9/11.
It’s a 9/11 debunking spectacular that goes into the political as well as the physical. It sounds like a bit of kismet. Alas, I won’t be watching because I don’t have cable but feel free to file a report!
judy on Aug 19
I am wondering why if you don’t believe in the governments involvement on 9/11, people think you are naive?
Am I? Is they a group for this? I would like to think our gov is not involved but I am starting to have doubts.
JuneBug on Aug 19
I will be logging out soon so I won’t be able to answer this till Monday eve. Someone will prob beat me to it, I hope. So as your mind will be at ease. Our government had nothing to do with 911. Please trust me. Will post facts tomorrow.
JuneBug on Aug 20
Just stopping by before I go to work. I know Popular Science did a conspiracy smashing piece about it if you want to look into it before I’m on here next.
princetrumpet on Aug 20
Ever try keeping a secret between 5 people, Judy? It’s more difficult than you’d think. Things leak out eventually. Now, multiply that by 100 and you have an idea of how difficult it would be to keep a project such as killing two buildngs full of people, setting sharges on each and every floor that would be necessary to accomplish what physics did and all as a pretext for a war that could have been launched without any of that.
As JB said, Popular Science did a good job of debunking the theories regarding the murders. The Pentagon had many, many people on the ground that saw what happened even if the stop-action security film couldn’t capture the plane hitting the building. It sounded like a missile? How many people that said that have actually heard a missile? Very few, I’m sure. A lot of folks are disturbed by the way the Pentagon hole looked vs. the way a plane outline looks. Unfortunately for them, crashes like that don’t work like Warner Bros. cartoons and there wouldn’t be a plane outline as a hole.
The bottom line is that the givernment could have cooked up a much better, easier scenario for war if that’s what they wanted to do without killing civilians. My recommendation, in all seriousness, is to wait for the next full moon and listen to Mike Medved’s “Conspiracy Day”. I’m not joking. He has a program every month when the full moon rises that deals with a variety of conspiracies and people always call in with concerns such as yours. Whether you’re naïve is not for me to judge but I don’t share your concern as relates to the government and possible 9/11 ties. We were attacked by terrorists who hate us for a second time (by the way: why weren’t people concerned about conspiracies back then? Because Clinton didn’t retaliate with a war.). Whether that action was worth going to war in Afghanistan is for you to decide. I believe it was.
fly on Aug 20
Please allow me to respond. People do not think you are naive. Moonbats think you are naive. President Bush is being blamed by the “blame America First” crowd, because the Clintons had 13 opportunities to take Bin Laden out during the clinton admin, three occasions where our CIA had Bin Laden in the crosshairs and were not allowed to take him out by the clintons. Shifting blame for catastrophe is the forte of the left wing. What Presidential papers do you think Sandy Burglar stuffed down his pants? Perhaps proof positive that the clintons were more concerned with sex and socialism to run the country. We call these “people” that consider the Bush Admin responsible for 911 “truthers”. Next time you are confronted by the “truthers” (if it is unavoidable) I would suggest you let them know you are on the them by calling them this. The entire movement, started by a slick hollywood dvd called “loose change” is totally absurd on it’s face. It is an agenda that is now driven by the likes of the Kos kids and the soros owned media. Just picture them all as rosie odonnell on her worst day.
judy on Aug 20
I feel better. It does seem like there should have been at least one person with hard facts that support this conspiracy not just someone in their basement with a bunch of photos, news paper clippings and red string.
princetrumpet on Aug 20
This is one reason among others that I can’t behind Ron Paul’s presidential bid. He sides with Michael Moore and Rosie O’Donnell as a 9/11 “truther”. <
Anyone can use a lot of loose innuendo to “prove” things but most of it when you look at them all together they don’t add up when you use continuous logic. Finally, when you have the time, Popular Mehcanics put out a book that explains almost everything they stand by regarding 9/11.
princetrumpet on Aug 20
JUDY!!! Do you get the History Channel? Look at what’s on tonight and this week:
http://www.history.com/shows.do?action=detail&episodeId=240087
It’s a 9/11 debunking spectacular that goes into the political as well as the physical. It sounds like a bit of kismet. Alas, I won’t be watching because I don’t have cable but feel free to file a report!
JuneBug on Aug 20
I’m back.
Thanks for helping guys. I don’t think Judy is naive, just has the wrong people around her is all.
Thanks for the heads up on the show on the History channel. I’m gonna tape it!
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html
Popular Mechanics Debunker on link above.